Pengaruh Tata Kelola Perusahaan Dan Tanggung Jawab Lingkungan Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan: Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2016-2018

Ahmad Faih

doi:10.55208/sd5cbr25

Authors

Ahmad Faih Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam UIN Sunan Kalijaga Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55208/sd5cbr25

Keywords:

Corporate Governance, Environmental Responsibility, The Value Of The Company

Abstract

This study aims to determine how corporate governance and environmental responsibility affect firm value and examine the correlation between corporate governance, environmental responsibility, and corporate value in Indonesia's country. This study's population are manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) with the 2016-2018 observation period. The statistical test used is the classical assumption test to test the hypothesis using multiple regression analysis tests. The environmental responsibility data index obtains by analyzing the contents of the company's 2016-2018 annual report. The result of this research is that corporate governance affects environmental responsibility. This research contributes to the literature on social responsibility in developing countries, especially Indonesia, because in the era of globalization, Indonesia has begun to attract investment opportunities that will affect the environment in the long term.

References

Al-Tuwaijri, S. A., Christensen, T. A., & Hughes, K. (2004). The Relations Among Environmental Disclosure, Environmental Performance, And Economic Performance: A Simultaneous Equations Approach. Accounting, Organizations And Society, 29(5–6), 447–471.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6), 1173–1182.

Deegan, C., & Rankin, M. (1997). The Materiality of Environmental Information to Users of Annual Reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 10 (4), 562.

Demsetz, H., & Villalonga, B. (2016). Ownership structure and corporate performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7 (3).

Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1995). Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values And Organizational Behavior. Pacific Sociological Journal Review, 18, 122–136.

Freeman, R. E., & Phillips, R. A. (2002). Stakeholder Theory: A Libertarian Defense. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12 (3), 331–349.

Gelb, D. S., & Zarowin, P. (2017). Corporate disclosure policy and the informativeness of stock prices. Review of Accounting Studies, 7 (1), 33–52.

Ghazali, N. A. (2007). Ownership Structure And Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Some Malaysian Evidence. Corporate Governance, 7 (3), 251–266.

Gujarati, D. N. (2009). Basic econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

Holder, W. L., Cohen, J. R., Nath, L., & Wood, D. (2009). The Supply Of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures Among U.S. Firms. Journal Of Business Ethics, 84 (4), 497–527.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory Of The Firm: Managerial Behavior , Agency Costs And Ownership Structure. Journal Of Financial Economics, 3 (4), 305–360.

Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. A. (2012). The Causal Effect Of Corporate Governance On Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal Of Business Ethics, 106 (1), 53–72.

Klein, A. (2002). Audit Committee, Board Of Director Characteristics, And Earnings Management. Journal Of Accounting And Economics, 33 (3), 375–400.

Moser, D. V., & Martin, P. R. (2012). A Broader Perspective On Corporate Social Responsibility Research In Accounting. The Accounting Review, 87 (3), 797–806.

Tsamenyi, M., Enninful, E., & Onumah, J. (2007). Disclosure And Corporate Governance In Developing Countries: Evidence From Ghana. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22 (3), 319–334.