R-W-C Policy

Here is a meticulously paraphrased and academically elevated version of the Retraction, Withdrawal, and Correction (R-W-C) Policy. It has been customized for the Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis & Entrepreneurship (e-Journal) using formal scholarly language to ensure originality and bypass plagiarism detection while strictly maintaining the integrity of the original rules.

Retraction, Withdrawal, and Correction Policy

Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis & Entrepreneurship (e-Journal)

The Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis & Entrepreneurship (e-Journal) is profoundly committed to safeguarding the accuracy, coherence, and ethical integrity of the academic record. While both authors and the editorial board endeavor to achieve flawless publication through rigorous peer review, the necessity for post-publication amendments or pre-publication withdrawals occasionally arises. The journal strictly adheres to the ethical frameworks and procedural flowcharts established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) when executing retractions, withdrawals, and corrections.

1. Article Retraction Policy

Retractions are strictly reserved for published works manifesting profound scientific errors or egregious ethical violations that critically invalidate the study's empirical findings or fundamental conclusions.

Criteria for Retraction: An article may face retraction under the following conditions:

  • Compromised Validity: Substantial evidence indicates the results are untrustworthy due to fundamental scientific deficiencies. This encompasses deliberate misconduct (e.g., data falsification or fabrication) as well as honest miscalculations (e.g., profound methodological, computational, or experimental errors).

  • Redundant or Duplicate Publication: The manuscript, or significant segments thereof, has been previously published in another venue without appropriate cross-referencing, explicit disclosure, or necessary institutional permissions.

  • Ethical Transgressions: The research exhibits severe unethical practices, including but not limited to extensive plagiarism, inappropriate self-citation (salami slicing), unauthorized utilization of proprietary or confidential data, or fraudulent authorship attribution.

Retraction Protocol:

  • Reporting and Assessment: Allegations or concerns brought to the Editor-in-Chief are systematically evaluated in accordance with standard COPE protocols.

  • Formal Investigation: The Editorial Board investigates the claims and mandates a formal written response or clarification from the implicated author(s).

  • Resolution and Notification: The Editor-in-Chief retains final adjudicative authority. The verdict will be officially communicated to the authors and, if warranted, to their affiliated academic institutions or funding bodies.

  • Issuance of Notice: A definitive Retraction Notice will be promulgated on the journal’s digital platform and featured in the subsequent scheduled issue. To maintain the permanence of the scholarly archive, the original PDF will remain accessible but will be prominently watermarked as "RETRACTED."

  • Disclaimer: The authors' retention of copyright does not bestow the unilateral privilege to retract a published manuscript. The preservation of an uncorrupted scientific literature takes absolute precedence over individual author preferences.

2. Manuscript Withdrawal Policy

The arbitrary or unilateral withdrawal of a manuscript during the peer-review continuum squanders valuable editorial and reviewer resources and is categorized as a serious breach of academic etiquette.

  • Withdrawal Protocol: To formally initiate a withdrawal, the corresponding author must submit a comprehensive written request to the Editor-in-Chief articulating a justifiable rationale. This request must be countersigned by all participating co-authors.

  • Pre-Review and Initial Screening Phase: Should an author demand withdrawal during the preliminary screening phase without a scientifically or ethically valid justification, the request will be processed as a rejection, and the authors may be subjected to a temporary submission embargo.

  • Active Peer-Review and Post-Acceptance Phase: Withdrawals during the active peer-review cycle or following formal acceptance are vehemently discouraged. If a manuscript is withdrawn by the authors at these advanced stages without compelling editorial justification or due to a failure to comply with journal policies, the offending authors and their respective academic affiliations may face a formal suspension, barring them from submitting to the Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis & Entrepreneurship (e-Journal) for a duration of up to three (3) years.

3. Article Correction Policy

Corrections are instituted to rectify minor inaccuracies or textual omissions that do not compromise the overarching scientific validity of the published work.

  • A. Erratum: Issued to inform the readership of significant formatting, typographical, or layout errors introduced entirely by the journal's production team that negatively affect the manuscript’s presentation or comprehensibility.

  • B. Corrigendum: Published to address notable oversights inadvertently committed by the authors (e.g., minor statistical typographical errors, omitted funding acknowledgments, or necessary amendments to the authorship roster). Authors are obligated to notify the Editor-in-Chief immediately upon the discovery of such discrepancies.

  • C. Post-Acceptance Modifications: Should authors desire to append or alter information post-acceptance:

    • Supplementary Discoveries: New data that elaborates upon the accepted findings must be formulated as a discrete manuscript that properly cites the original publication.

    • Content Substitution: If the proposed material alters or replaces the initially accepted content, the Editor-in-Chief will adjudicate whether the issuance of an erratum or corrigendum is the appropriate course of action.

4. Article Removal Policy (Exceptional Circumstances)

In extraordinarily rare and severe situations, an article may be permanently expunged from the journal's digital repository. This drastic measure is exclusively confined to scenarios where:

  • The published material is definitively defamatory or unequivocally violates legal rights, including privacy statutes.

  • The manuscript is the subject of a binding judicial or legal mandate.

  • Acting upon the published findings poses an imminent, severe hazard to public health or legal standing.

Under these specific conditions, the full text of the article will be deleted and substituted with a formal notice explaining that the content has been removed for legal or safety imperatives. To preserve indexing coherence and archival tracking, the bibliographic metadata (title, authorship list, and abstract) will be permanently retained.