Level Regarding Corruption of Local Governments

Perspective of Financial Statement Accountability, Financial Performance, and Size of Local Governments

Authors

  • Roro Endah Kumalasari Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Pasundan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55208/ks632c51

Keywords:

Accountability of Regional Financial Reports, Local Government Financial Performance, Size of Local Government, Local Government Corruption

Abstract

This study intends to determine the magnitude of the influence of regional financial statement accountability, local government financial performance, and local government's size on local governments' corruption in the Province of Indonesia. This study uses a quantitative approach using secondary data obtained from the Regional Government Financial Statements for 2011 to 2015 and the amount of corruption reported by the KPK from 2011 to 2015. Using panel data to analyze research data to obtain the best model is the Random Effect. The results showed that the accountability of local government financial reports, local government financial performance, and local government size simultaneously had a significant effect on corruption.

References

Halim. (2012). Akuntansi Keuangan Daerah, Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Heriningsih, S., & Marita, M. (2013). Pengaruh opini audit dan kinerja keuangan pemerintah daerah terhadap tingkat korupsi pemerintah daerah (studi empiris pada pemerintah kabupaten dan kota di pulau jawa). Jurnal Manajemen, Akuntansi dan Ekonomi Pembangunan, 11(1), 67-78.

IHPS BPK Tahun 2011- 2015

Frank, B., Lambsdorff, J. G., & Boehm, F. (2011). Gender and corruption: Lessons from laboratory corruption experiments. The European Journal of Development Research, 23(1), 59-71.

Khairudin, K., & Erlanda, R. (2016). Pengaruh Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah (LKPD) Terhadap Tingkat Korupsi Pemerintah Daerah (Studi pada Pemerintah Kota Se-Sumatera). Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 7(2), 137-154.

Lambsdorff, J. G. (2006). Measuring corruption–the validity and precision of subjective indicators (CPI). Measuring corruption, 81, 81.

Lambsdorff, J. G. (2007). The institutional economics of corruption and reform: Theory, evidence and policy. Cambridge university press.

Laptah KPK Tahun 2011 - 2015

LKPD Provinsi Indonesia Tahun 2010 - 2015

Mahmudi. (2016). Akuntansi Sektor Publik. UII Press.

Nurhasanah, N. (2016). Efektivitas Pengendalian Internal, Audit Internal, Karakteristik Instansi dan Kasus Korupsi (Studi Empiris di Kementerian/Lembaga). Jurnal Tata Kelola dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara, 2(1), 27-48.

Olken, B. A. (2007). Monitoring corruption: evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. Journal of political Economy, 115(2), 200-249.

Pratama, R. A., & Faisal, F. (2016). Pengaruh Hasil Pemeriksaan BPK, Kinerja Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah Dan Ukuran Pemerintah Daerah Terhadap Nilai Indeks Persepsi Korupsi Pemerintah Daerah. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 5(3), 1-14.

Syahadatina, R., & Fitriyana, I. (2016). Pengaruh Sumber Daya Manusia Bidang Keuangan Dan Sistem Pengendalian Internal Terhadap Kualitas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah. JURNAL AKUNTANSI DAN INVESTASI, 1(1), 77-92.

Wulandari, R. (2015). Pengaruh Akuntabilitas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah (LKPD) dan Kinerja Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah Terhadap Tingkat Korupsi Pemerintah Daerah Di Indonesia (Bachelor's thesis, Jakarta: Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta).

Published

15-04-2020

How to Cite

Kumalasari, R. E. (2020). Level Regarding Corruption of Local Governments: Perspective of Financial Statement Accountability, Financial Performance, and Size of Local Governments. Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis & Entrepreneurship, 14(1), 9-23. https://doi.org/10.55208/ks632c51