Effect of Work Supervision and Discipline on Employee Performance
Study on A Manufacturing Company in Bandung City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55208/g51nrm18Keywords:
Supervision, Work Discipline, Employee PerformanceAbstract
This study aimed to determine the effect of supervision and work discipline on employee performance. This research method uses a quantitative approach with multiple regression analysis. The source of this research uses primary data. This research data collection using a questionnaire. The sample of this research is 57 employees using the saturated sampling technique. The results of this study indicate that partially and simultaneously, there is a significant influence between the variables of supervision and work discipline on employee performance, where supervision and work discipline have a simultaneous effect of 58.8% on employee performance. At the same time, the remaining 41.2% were influenced by other factors not observed in this study. Recommendations for performance the supervision carried out can be hiring human resources following the qualifications. Furthermore, preferably implementing a reward and punishment system for those who have a good or inadequate level of work discipline, pay attention to the level of employee attendance, establish rules, and strict legal sanctions.
References
Cangiano, F., Parker, S. K., & Yeo, G. B. (2019). Does daily proactivity affect well‐being? The moderating role of punitive supervision. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(1), 59-72.
Hersona, S., & Sidharta, I. (2017). Influence of leadership function, motivation and work discipline on employees’performance. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 15(3), 528-537.
Jahanzeb, S., Fatima, T., Bouckenooghe, D., & Bashir, F. (2019). The knowledge hiding link: a moderated mediation model of how abusive supervision affects employee creativity. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(6), 810-819.
Lapointe, É., & Vandenberghe, C. (2017). Supervisory mentoring and employee affective commitment and turnover: The critical role of contextual factors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 98, 98-107.
Lee, M. C. C., Idris, M. A., & Tuckey, M. (2019). Supervisory coaching and performance feedback as mediators of the relationships between leadership styles, work engagement, and turnover intention. Human Resource Development International, 22(3), 257-282.
Lin, B., Mainemelis, C., & Kark, R. (2016). Leaders' responses to creative deviance: Differential effects on subsequent creative deviance and creative performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(4), 537-556.
Nica, E. (2016). The effect of perceived organizational support on organizational commitment and employee performance. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 4(4), 34-40.
Shaju, M., & Subhashini, D. (2017). A study on the impact of job satisfaction on job performance of employees working in automobile industry. Journal of management research, 17(2), 74-83.
Suryadana, M. L., & Sidharta, I. (2019). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Industri Hospitality. Yogyakarta: Diandra Kreatif.
Walter, F., Lam, C. K., Van Der Vegt, G. S., Huang, X., & Miao, Q. (2015). Abusive supervision and subordinate performance: Instrumentality considerations in the emergence and consequences of abusive supervision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4), 1056 –1072. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038513
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Kiki Andang P, Aan Hardiyana (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
